iceinyourmusic: (Default)
iceinyourmusic ([personal profile] iceinyourmusic) wrote2005-07-12 11:05 pm

why i'll never mention little women or 90210 again:

reading friendsfriends, and stuff, and was reminded of what i periodically understand: that i'm going to a hell made for ONE for never, never once having thought that jo should have married laurie instead, or laurie jo. i don't know why. it just never occurred to me at all.

or maybe because AMY/LAURIE=THEONETRUELOVE.

of course, then i grew up, and became a brandon/kelly shipper instead.

[identity profile] callmesandy.livejournal.com 2005-07-12 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
A. I completely agree with you on the Little Women thing! I DO!

B. But you're so so wrong about BH90210. Brandon/Brenda/Dylan 4EVAAAAH!
ext_872: eye with red flower petals as eyelashes (that's eskimo!)

[identity profile] bossymarmalade.livejournal.com 2005-07-12 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Jo and Laurie together would have been a NIGHTMARE, and I'm not just saying that because I identified with Jo and am MADLY IN LOVE with Dr. Bhaer. It's just wrong; Laurie and the Princess were MADE for each other. They can do artsy things and eat pickled lemons and wear clothespins on their pretty little noses ALL DAY LONG.

(Anonymous) 2005-07-12 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)
OMG you were reading MY friendspage, weren't you?! Heee. Was it sloanesomething?

Also I'm sorry, but LAURIE/JO 4EVER. They were so -- ! And with the -- ! (Possibly this is largely influenced by my 14-year-old-self's crush on Christian Bale. Ahem.)

[identity profile] gatefiction.livejournal.com 2005-07-12 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
AMY/LAURIE ONETWUELOOOOOOVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(however kelly/dylan OTP and brandon/brenda... you know)